Module 15 Visual Coverage Map
Governing subject visual profile: .agents/visual-profiles/trainings/construction-plan-drafting-and-coordination.md (owned by PR #4527). This profile governs discipline, plan/section/isometric usage, Philippine construction-document context, accessibility, semantic color redundancy, SI-unit expectations, physical plausibility, review boundaries, and cognitive load for this training subject.
Secondary/reference precedent only: .agents/visual-profiles/civil/engineering-drawing-and-plans.md is used only as a precedent for the already-registered engineering-drawing visualizers reused in this module. It does not govern this training subject. Every reused interactive below was rechecked against the canonical training profile.
| Asset | Objective / learning question | Concept | Medium / why | Technical basis | Nonredundancy / accessibility | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural Design-Intent Translation Chain | Trace checked engineering evidence into authorized construction communication. | Design-to-drawing information chain | TrainingConceptDiagram stack; hierarchy and responsibility are the learning focus. | RA 544 as amended by RA 1582; project-adopted NSCP/referral-code basis (publicly verified current references still cite NSCP Volume I, 7th Edition, 2015); ACI PRC-315-18 presentation guidance. | Establishes overall production logic only. Text preserves meaning without color. | Verified |
| Foundation-Plan Information Anatomy | Identify the information needed to locate and interpret a foundation mark. | Foundation plan anatomy | Grid diagram; location, identity, level, geometry, detail, and interface are parallel categories. | ACI PRC-315-18 presentation guidance; ISO 3766 reinforcement representation. | Isolates foundation reading rather than reinforcement detail. | Verified |
| Superstructure Framing Hierarchy | Read a framing plan from level/grid through members, slab/roof zones, openings, and details. | Framing-plan hierarchy | Sequence diagram; clear progressive reading order. | Project structural basis; ISO 128-1 representation. | Distinct from foundation and reinforcement visuals. | Verified |
| Reinforcement Information Chain | Determine whether a bar instruction is complete. | Bar identity, size/quantity, position, extent, anchorage, revision | Stack diagram; completeness requires ordered information layers. | ACI PRC-315-18; ISO 3766:2003. | Distinct from the plan/section/schedule trace by focusing on one reinforcement instruction. | Verified |
| Plan-to-Section-to-Schedule Trace | Verify bidirectional structural cross-references. | Member mark traceability | Loop diagram; repeated trace/revision checking is the intended reasoning pattern. | ACI PRC-315-18; ISO 3766; project revision control. | Distinct from reinforcement completeness; focuses on document linkage. | Verified |
| Constructability Conflict Recognition | Distinguish coordination-ready interfaces from conditions requiring engineering resolution. | Congestion, penetrations, embeds, temporary/sequence conflicts | Compare diagram; misconception-driven contrast makes escalation boundaries explicit. | ACI PRC-315-18 constructability/detailing intent; responsible-engineer design basis. | Distinct from documentation trace by focusing on physical buildability. | Verified |
| Interactive Structural Plan Reader | Navigate foundation/floor/roof framing, isolate layers, and trace member/opening marks to schedules/details. | Structural plan anatomy and traceability | Existing PlanReader; interactive drawing layers and marks provide exact plan-reading practice. | Existing audited engineering-drawing simulation; ACI PRC-315-18 and project drawing conventions. | Adds technical plan geometry and mark navigation, distinct from the abstract trace loop. | Verified |
| Interactive RC Reinforcement and Constructability Lab | Inspect bar/tie geometry, layers, spacing concepts, zones, splices, and an opening conflict. | Reinforcement representation and congestion | Existing RcDetailingLabSim; manipulable section geometry materially improves constructability recognition. | Existing audited structural-detailing simulation; ACI PRC-315-18; ISO 3766. | Adds section-level physical geometry; explicitly framed as teaching values, not design. | Verified |
| Structural Design-to-Document, Constructability, and Release Review | Verify analysis/design output ↔ calculations ↔ member schedules ↔ drawings ↔ specifications before constructability/interface review and engineer authorization. | Structural consistency/release workflow | Shared Flowchart; design-to-document consistency, constructability, resolution, and authorization require explicit gates. | RA 544 as amended by RA 1582; project-adopted NSCP/referral-code basis; ACI PRC-315-18 guidance; ISO 3766; AISC 303-22 only where adopted, with current publisher errata; lesson rules. | Integrates but does not duplicate individual concept diagrams; shared renderer provides accessible text. | Verified |
Count: 9 qualifying visual learning assets. No decorative, variant, or duplicated assets are counted.
Reused Interactives — Subject-Profile Compliance
PlanReader: PASS. The component uses deterministic structural-plan geometry, member marks, schedules/details, and text-visible conflict/review states. Source-level review confirms native controls, accessible labels/roles, keyboard-operable interaction, SI-oriented values, and current-state text. Openings or revision conflicts are identified for review; the visual does not authorize an unreviewed penetration or choose a structural solution.RcDetailingLabSim: PASS. The component uses section/detail geometry to teach reinforcement layers, ties, spacing concepts, splice/zone relationships, and congestion/opening conflicts. Source-level review confirms accessible/native controls, keyboard operation, labels, SI-oriented values, and textual state. The lesson explicitly frames displayed values as teaching data, not project reinforcement design, and requires responsible-engineer resolution for structural conflicts.