Module 14 Visual Coverage Map
Governing subject visual profile: .agents/visual-profiles/trainings/construction-plan-drafting-and-coordination.md (owned by PR #4527). This profile governs discipline, plan/section/isometric usage, Philippine construction-document context, accessibility, semantic color redundancy, SI-unit expectations, physical plausibility, review boundaries, and cognitive load for this training subject.
Secondary/reference precedent only: .agents/visual-profiles/civil/engineering-drawing-and-plans.md is used only as a precedent for the already-registered engineering-drawing visualizers reused in this module. It does not govern this training subject. Every reused interactive below was rechecked against the canonical training profile.
| Asset | Objective / learning question | Concept | Medium / why | Technical basis | Nonredundancy / accessibility | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architectural Information Stack | Understand how general information, plans, vertical views, details, and schedules form one set. | Drawing-set hierarchy | TrainingConceptDiagram stack; document levels are categorical and ordered. | RA 9266; 2004 Revised IRR of PD 1096 Section 302 as reproduced/upheld in Supreme Court G.R. Nos. 200015 & 205846 (2023); ISO 128-1; ISO 7200; authorized architectural basis. | Establishes set architecture only. Numbered text provides nonvisual meaning. | Verified |
| Floor-Plan Annotation Anatomy | Identify what each annotation class controls. | Location, identity, elevation, navigation, finish, coordination | Grid diagram; parallel annotation categories do not require a workflow. | ISO 128-1 representation principles; project drawing standards. | Distinct from roof and cross-reference visuals. Every cell is textual. | Verified |
| Roof-Plan Coordination Anatomy | Trace roof geometry into drainage, penetrations, structure, and details. | Roof coordination | Sequence diagram; the coordination dependency is linear enough for a compact deterministic visual. | Authorized architectural/plumbing/structural design inputs; PD 1096 context. | Distinct from floor-plan anatomy by isolating roof interfaces. | Verified |
| Plan-Elevation-Section Relationship | Explain how horizontal and vertical views describe one building. | Orthographic view consistency | Compare diagram; horizontal vs vertical definition is the central contrast. | ISO 128-1 general technical representation; authorized project geometry. | Distinct from set hierarchy by teaching geometric correspondence. Labeled columns avoid color-only meaning. | Verified |
| Schedule-and-Detail Reference Chain | Trace a location through marks, views, details, schedules/specifications, and revision. | Cross-reference integrity | Loop diagram; emphasizes recurring bidirectional checking without simulating design. | ISO 7200 document-control fields; project revision/reference system. | Distinct from geometry visuals by focusing on document navigation. | Verified |
| Interactive Floor-Plan Cut Explorer | Relate a horizontal cutting plane to the actual elements cut, seen beyond, overhead, or hidden. | Floor-plan representation geometry | Existing FloorPlanCutExplorerSim; interactive cut-plane movement teaches plan linework more directly than static boxes. | Existing audited engineering-drawing simulation; ISO 128-1 representation principles. | Adds exact view-generation geometry; separate from annotation categories. Labeled interactive states support interpretation. | Verified |
| Interactive Architectural Set Coordinator | Trace a building element across plan, elevation, section, RCP, schedules, and consultant references. | Drawing-set coordination and stale-source detection | Existing ArchitecturalSetCoordinatorSim; multi-view interaction materially improves cross-reference practice. | Existing audited engineering-drawing simulation; authorized architectural basis; BP 344 accessibility interfaces; RA 9514/BFP fire/life-safety interfaces; revision control. | Adds hands-on set navigation rather than abstract reference-chain explanation. | Verified |
| Architectural Drawing Production and Cross-Reference Review | Decide whether documentation is complete, coordinated, and ready for responsible-Architect review. | Production/release workflow | Shared Flowchart; branching on reference integrity, compatibility, and authorized response is material. | RA 9266; Supreme Court G.R. Nos. 200015 & 205846 (2023); PD 1096; lesson coordination rules. | Formal decision workflow; shared renderer supplies accessible textual equivalent. | Verified |
Count: 8 qualifying visual learning assets. No decorative or near-duplicate assets are counted.
Reused Interactives — Subject-Profile Compliance
FloorPlanCutExplorerSim: PASS. The visual uses plan/section technical geometry for the exact learning target: how a horizontal cutting plane changes architectural plan linework. Source-level review confirms native controls, accessible labels/roles, keyboard-operable interaction, and textual state. It teaches representation rather than architectural design and does not embed fake permits, seals, or jurisdictional values.ArchitecturalSetCoordinatorSim: PASS. The visual uses plan/elevation/section/RCP/schedule relationships consistent with the subject profile's construction-document language. It exposes stale/conflicting source conditions as coordination issues rather than automatically changing the design. Source-level review confirms labeled/native controls, keyboard-operable interaction, and text-visible state. The surrounding lesson preserves the responsible Architect's professional authority and the Philippine documentation framework.