Module 13 Visual Coverage Map
Governing subject visual profile: .agents/visual-profiles/trainings/construction-plan-drafting-and-coordination.md (owned by PR #4527). This profile governs discipline, plan/section/isometric usage, Philippine construction-document context, accessibility, semantic color redundancy, SI-unit expectations, physical plausibility, review boundaries, and cognitive load for this training subject.
Secondary/reference precedent only: .agents/visual-profiles/civil/engineering-drawing-and-plans.md is used only as a precedent for the already-registered engineering-drawing visualizers reused in this module. It does not govern this training subject. Every reused interactive below was rechecked against the canonical training profile.
| Asset | Objective / learning question | Concept | Medium / why | Technical basis | Nonredundancy / accessibility | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site Information Hierarchy | Identify the controlled inputs that must exist before civil/site production. What information is fact, constraint, authorized design, interface, or output? | Survey/design information hierarchy | TrainingConceptDiagram stack; ordered information ownership is clearer than a pictorial site plan. | RA 544 as amended by RA 1582 for civil scope; RA 8560 as amended by RA 9200 for geodetic/survey scope; PD 1096 building/site context; project survey/design controls. | Distinct from spatial/elevation relationships. Text labels preserve meaning without color. | Verified |
| Iterative Site-to-Building Coordination Loop | Reconcile survey base, architectural site layout, grading, drainage, utilities, and building FFL/thresholds. Which interface must be revisited when another changes? | Multidisciplinary site/building coordination | TrainingConceptDiagram loop; the real process is iterative rather than a one-way dependency chain. | Controlled survey geometry and project datum; architectural/civil/structural/plumbing interfaces. | Distinct from the input hierarchy by focusing on repeated cross-discipline reconciliation. Text sequence plus loop label is accessible. | Verified |
| One Datum, Many Elevation Uses | Distinguish different physical level types while keeping one controlled datum. | Vertical control and discipline levels | Grid diagram; parallel level uses are easier to compare side by side. | PD 1096 context; project benchmark/datum practice; drawing-control principles. | Distinct from grading/drainage because it isolates datum semantics. Labels do not rely on color. | Verified |
| Grade-to-Drainage Relationship | Recognize coordinated vs defective grading information. Where should water move, and what contradictions signal a problem? | Surface grading and drainage continuity | Compare diagram; misconception-driven contrast is more effective than another sequence. | Responsible civil/hydrologic-hydraulic design; verified datum; receiving/outfall constraints; current project/authority criteria, including DPWH DGCS where adopted. | Distinct from datum control by focusing on surface behavior. Both columns are fully labeled. | Verified |
| Interactive Topographic Plan Reader | Interpret contours, spot elevations, terrain form, and survey features before grading. | Topographic plan reading | Existing TopographicMapSim; interactive technical plan geometry is stronger than another relationship diagram. | Existing audited engineering-drawing simulation; verified survey/datum concepts in the lesson. | Adds exact spatial/terrain interpretation rather than process logic. Registered viewer provides labeled visual interaction. | Verified |
| Civil/Site Drawing Coordination Review | Decide whether the package is compatible, needs authorized correction, or must be held. | Release/coordination workflow | Shared Flowchart; branching and hold/response logic materially affect correct application. | Content lesson; RA 544 as amended by RA 1582; RA 8560 as amended by RA 9200; PD 1096; project-adopted DPWH/LGU/utility-owner drainage criteria; controlled revisions. | Distinct from concept diagrams by formalizing decision logic. Shared renderer provides graph-derived accessible text. | Verified |
Count: 6 qualifying visual learning assets. No decorative or duplicate assets are counted.
Reused Interactive — Subject-Profile Compliance
TopographicMapSim: PASS. The component uses deterministic SVG/technical plan geometry appropriate to survey and site interpretation, with labeled terrain/contour information and SI-oriented values. Source-level review confirms native interactive controls, accessible labels/roles, keyboard-operable controls, and textual state. It is used only to teach topographic-plan reading; the surrounding lesson explicitly identifies its values as a teaching dataset and requires the verified survey/datum and authorized civil design to control actual work. It does not imply authority to alter survey control or select drainage/grading criteria.