Module 8: AI Assistants, Agents, Connectors, and Automation - Worked Examples
Agentic Engineering for Teaching Professionals
These examples move from bounded AI assistance toward reusable teaching workflows. Adapt every prompt to the participant's actual subject, institution, learner level, evidence, and authorized tools rather than treating any template as universally correct.
File-Aware Course Assistant
An approved syllabus v2 sets an assignment deadline on Friday. An older FAQ v1 says Thursday. The course owner explicitly designates syllabus v2 as controlling. Test a read-only assistant asked for the deadline.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedResearch and Literature Assistant
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedPresentation Creation Workflow
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedAssessment Development Assistant
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedGradebook Analysis Assistant
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedFaculty Administrative Assistant
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedSimple Teaching Agent Design
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedPlanner-Creator-Reviewer Demonstration
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedHands-On Lab — Design a Safe Teaching Agent
Activity goal: Specify a bounded teaching or faculty assistant with controlled sources, tools, permissions, stop conditions, evaluations, and approval gates.
Required evidence and deliverables:
- Agent objective and out-of-scope statement.
- Approved source and knowledge list.
- Tool/connector permission matrix.
- Structured workflow and output schema.
- Five evaluation cases including tool failure and unauthorized action.
- Human approval and audit-record design.
Assessment rubric — 25 points
| Criterion | Points | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Objective and scope | 5 | The agent has one clear job and explicit exclusions. |
| Sources and permissions | 5 | Authoritative inputs and least-privilege access are well defined. |
| Workflow design | 5 | Stages, outputs, state, and stop conditions are coherent. |
| Evaluation | 5 | Tests include normal, missing-data, failure, and unauthorized-action cases. |
| Human control | 5 | Consequential actions require meaningful review and traceability. |