Module 7: Learning Analytics, Intervention, and CQI - Worked Examples
Agentic Engineering for Teaching Professionals
These examples move from bounded AI assistance toward reusable teaching workflows. Adapt every prompt to the participant's actual subject, institution, learner level, evidence, and authorized tools rather than treating any template as universally correct.
Analyzing a Simple Gradebook
A synthetic ten-point assessment contains scores 8, 6, blank, and 10. The supplied data dictionary says a blank means "not recorded"; no rule authorizes treating it as zero. Report a defensible summary.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedFinding Weak Assessment Items
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedMapping Scores to Outcomes
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedIdentifying Class-Wide Learning Gaps
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedDesigning a Remediation Plan
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedCreating Feedback Groups Without Profiling
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedComparing Pre- and Post-Intervention Results
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedGenerating a CQI Evidence Summary
Apply this exercise to a specific teaching context and preserve the learner level, governing evidence, and institutional constraints that make the result valid.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedHands-On Lab — Analyze a Synthetic Gradebook and Design an Intervention
Activity goal: Validate and analyze a synthetic dataset, identify an evidence-supported learning gap, and design a follow-up intervention without profiling learners.
Required evidence and deliverables:
- Validated data dictionary and identified data-quality issues.
- Descriptive performance summary with at least one appropriate chart/table plan.
- Item or outcome analysis tied to supplied mappings.
- One learning-gap statement with competing explanations.
- Intervention and follow-up evidence plan, plus a CQI table stub.
Assessment rubric — 25 points
| Criterion | Points | Required evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Data validation | 5 | Schema, scales, missing values, mappings, and privacy are checked before analysis. |
| Analytical correctness | 5 | Summaries and interpretations are reproducible and appropriate. |
| Evidence discipline | 5 | Learning-gap claims distinguish observation from explanation. |
| Intervention quality | 5 | Action is targeted to the diagnosed need and defines follow-up evidence. |
| CQI traceability | 5 | Evidence, action, status, and future reassessment are clearly separated. |