Retaining Walls — Worked Examples

These examples use explicit earth-pressure and stability assumptions and keep the retained height, footing geometry, weights, lever arms, and resultants consistent from start to finish.

Cantilever Retaining Wall Stability Explorer

Focused Rankine service-load model with consistent wall geometry.

Controls

Retained height HH4.5 m
Base width BB3.0 m
Soil friction angle ϕ\phi30°
Base friction coefficient μ\mu0.50

Geometry and active thrust

Pa = 60.8 kN/mB = 3.0 mtoe 1.00 mheel 1.60 mH = 4.5 m

Service stability results

Rankine coefficient
0.333
Active thrust
60.8 kN/m
Overturning FS
3.22
meets lesson target (2.0)
Sliding FS
1.72
meets lesson target (1.5)

Moments about bottom toe: resisting 391.0 kN·m/m; overturning 121.5 kN·m/m.

Vertical force: 208.8 kN/m; base friction resistance 104.4 kN/m.

Resultant: 1.291 m from toe; eccentricity 0.209 m toward toe.

Full-contact bearing: toe 98.8 kPa; heel 40.4 kPa. Compare the applicable maximum pressure and settlement with project geotechnical criteria separately.

Model scope: level drained homogeneous cohesionless backfill; smooth vertical wall; Rankine active pressure; γs=18kN/m3\gamma_s=18\\ \text{kN}/\text{m}^3; γc=24kN/m3\gamma_c=24\\ \text{kN}/\text{m}^3; 0.50 m footing; 0.40 m stem; toe =B/3=B/3; no surcharge, water, seismic force, or passive resistance. The 2.0 overturning and 1.5 sliding values are lesson targets for this traditional service-load format, not universal code requirements.

Example 1: Complete Service Stability Check with One Consistent Geometry

Problem: A cantilever retaining wall has a retained height H=4.5 mH=4.5\text{ m} measured from the top of its 0.5 m0.5\text{ m} footing to the top of backfill, so the overall concrete system is 5.0 m5.0\text{ m} from footing bottom to wall top. The base width is B=3.0 mB=3.0\text{ m}, consisting of a 1.0 m1.0\text{ m} toe, 0.4 m0.4\text{ m} stem, and 1.6 m1.6\text{ m} heel. Use γs=18 kN/m3\gamma_s=18\text{ kN/m}^3, ϕ=30∘\phi=30^\circ, γc=24 kN/m3\gamma_c=24\text{ kN/m}^3, and base friction coefficient μ=0.50\mu=0.50.

Use the lesson's simplified Rankine model: level homogeneous cohesionless drained backfill, smooth vertical wall, no surcharge, no water pressure, no seismic action, and no credited passive resistance. Check overturning, sliding, resultant location, and full-contact bearing. Bearing capacity is not given, so do not claim a bearing-capacity pass.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 4 Steps Completed
1

Example 2: Overturning from an Equivalent-Fluid Static Pressure

Problem: A 6.0 m6.0\text{ m} retained height is represented directly by a triangular equivalent-fluid lateral-pressure distribution with coefficient weq=5.5 kN/m3w_{eq}=5.5\text{ kN/m}^3. The base of this pressure diagram coincides with the overturning reference elevation. If ∑MR=750 kN⋅m/m\sum M_R=750\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m/m}, calculate the service overturning factor of safety. Ignore passive resistance and other lateral actions.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 3: Eccentricity and Full-Contact Bearing Pressure

Problem: A service vertical resultant Rv=300 kN/mR_v=300\text{ kN/m} acts with eccentricity e=0.60 me=0.60\text{ m} toward the toe of a B=4.0 mB=4.0\text{ m} base. Determine whether the middle-third condition is satisfied and calculate the toe and heel contact pressures if full contact applies.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 4: Hydrostatic Pressure after Loss of Drainage

Problem: A wall was designed for drained backfill, but a drainage failure allows water to rise to Hw=4.0 mH_w=4.0\text{ m} behind the wall. Calculate the additional hydrostatic resultant using γw=9.81 kN/m3\gamma_w=9.81\text{ kN/m}^3 and explain why it must be added separately to the effective-stress earth-pressure model.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 5: Coulomb Active Pressure with Sloping Backfill

Problem: A vertical wall retains H=6.0 mH=6.0\text{ m} of homogeneous cohesionless drained soil with γ=18.5 kN/m3\gamma=18.5\text{ kN/m}^3, ϕ=32∘\phi=32^\circ, backfill slope β=10∘\beta=10^\circ, and wall friction δ=20∘\delta=20^\circ. Under the angle convention used in the lesson, calculate the Coulomb active coefficient and total thrust. No surcharge, water pressure, or seismic action is included.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 6: Surcharge Added to the Corrected Wall Geometry

Problem: Add a uniform surcharge q=15 kPaq=15\text{ kPa} to the drained level backfill of Example 1. Use H=4.5 mH=4.5\text{ m} and Ka=1/3K_a=1/3. For a conservative teaching check, ignore any beneficial vertical surcharge weight over the heel and add only its destabilizing lateral effect. Recalculate the overturning moment and overturning factor of safety using ∑MR=390.96 kN⋅m/m\sum M_R=390.96\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m/m}.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 7: Sliding Check with Limited Passive Resistance

Problem: A wall has horizontal driving force PH=150 kN/mP_H=150\text{ kN/m} and service vertical force ∑V=240 kN/m\sum V=240\text{ kN/m}. The base friction coefficient is μ=0.40\mu=0.40. A shear-key model predicts a theoretical passive resistance of 80 kN/m80\text{ kN/m}, but the selected design basis credits only 40 kN/m40\text{ kN/m} after considering mobilization and geotechnical uncertainty. Calculate the sliding factor of safety.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 8: Factored Structural Moment in a Heel Slab

Problem: A 2.0 m2.0\text{ m} heel slab is 0.50 m0.50\text{ m} thick and supports 4.0 m4.0\text{ m} of backfill with γs=18 kN/m3\gamma_s=18\text{ kN/m}^3. For this isolated teaching calculation, ignore upward bearing pressure and other loads and use the stated factored dead-load multiplier 1.21.2 only. Concrete unit weight is 24 kN/m324\text{ kN/m}^3. Determine the factored cantilever moment at the stem face.

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1

Example 9: Why a Static Rankine Check Is Not a Seismic Check

Problem: A wall has been verified under static Rankine active pressure for level drained backfill. The site engineer now requests earthquake stability verification. Is it acceptable to reuse the same static KaK_a and simply label the resulting force “seismic earth pressure”?

Step-by-Step Solution

0 of 2 Steps Completed
1