Bearing Capacity
Learning Objectives
- Understand the concept of bearing capacity and its importance in foundation design.
- Apply Terzaghi's bearing capacity theory to calculate ultimate and allowable bearing capacity.
- Evaluate the effect of the groundwater table on soil bearing capacity.
- Understand the general bearing capacity equation and the effects of eccentric loading.
Bearing Capacity
The maximum contact pressure between the foundation and the soil which should not produce shear failure in the soil.
Ultimate Bearing Capacity ()
The theoretical maximum pressure that can be supported without catastrophic shear failure occurring in the supporting soil mass.
Allowable Bearing Capacity ()
The working pressure used for design, derived by dividing the ultimate bearing capacity by a Factor of Safety (FS) to ensure stability and limit settlement.
Modes of Shear Failure
Depending on the soil's relative density or stiffness, failure can occur in one of three primary modes:
- General Shear Failure: Occurs in dense sands or stiff clays. It is characterized by a well-defined, continuous slip surface that extends all the way to the ground surface, resulting in sudden, catastrophic heaving on one or both sides of the footing.
- Local Shear Failure: Occurs in medium dense sands or medium stiff clays. The slip surface extends only a short distance into the soil mass before terminating. Settlement is significant before any clear failure surface reaches the ground.
- Punching Shear Failure: Occurs in loose sands or very soft clays. The footing simply punches downward into the soil with excessive settlement. No heave is observed at the surface, and the failure planes are strictly vertical beneath the footing edges.
Local Shear Adjustments
When designing for local or punching shear failure (loose/soft soils), the theoretical soil parameters must be empirically reduced. Terzaghi recommended using reduced cohesion () and a reduced friction angle () before looking up bearing capacity factors.
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory
Terzaghi's Key Assumptions
Terzaghi's classical derivation rests on several simplifying assumptions:
- The foundation is a continuous strip footing (length ).
- The foundation depth is shallow ().
- The soil beneath the foundation is homogeneous and semi-infinite.
- General shear failure governs the failure mechanism.
- The base of the footing is rough, preventing soil from sliding along it.
- The soil above the base of the footing () only provides weight (surcharge ), offering no shear resistance.
General Equation (Strip Footing)
Terzaghi's Ultimate Bearing Capacity
Classic three-term formula for the ultimate bearing capacity of a continuous strip footing on a semi-infinite soil mass.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Cohesion of the soil | - | |
| Bearing capacity factor for cohesion | - | |
| Effective overburden pressure at foundation base (\gamma D_f) | - | |
| Bearing capacity factor for surcharge | - | |
| Unit weight of soil below foundation | - | |
| Width of the strip footing | - | |
| Bearing capacity factor for soil weight | - |
- : The cohesion term. Accounts for shear strength derived from soil cohesion.
- : The surcharge term. Accounts for the stabilizing weight of soil above the base.
- : The density (wedge) term. Accounts for resistance provided by soil weight below the base.
- are strictly mathematical functions of the internal friction angle ().
Shape Factors
Because Terzaghi's original equation was explicitly derived for an infinitely long strip footing, empirical shape factors are applied to modify the equation for other common foundation geometries:
Square Footing ():
Bearing Capacity (Square Footing)
Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation modified with empirical shape factors for a square footing.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Cohesion | - | |
| Bearing capacity factors | - | |
| Overburden pressure | - | |
| Unit weight of soil | - | |
| Width of the square footing | - |
Circular Footing (Diameter ):
Bearing Capacity (Circular Footing)
Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation modified with empirical shape factors for a circular footing.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Cohesion | - | |
| Bearing capacity factors | - | |
| Overburden pressure | - | |
| Unit weight of soil | - | |
| Diameter of the circular footing | - |
Allowable Bearing Capacity
To account for inherent soil variability and uncertainties in load estimation, the design load must provide an adequate Factor of Safety () against catastrophic shear failure.
Allowable Bearing Capacity
Safe design bearing capacity obtained by dividing the ultimate capacity by a factor of safety; typically FS = 3.0 for permanent structures.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Allowable bearing capacity | - | |
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Factor of Safety | - |
- Typical FS: 3.0 is the standard for permanent structures.
- Net Allowable Bearing Capacity (): Represents the additional pressure the soil can safely take above the original in-situ overburden pressure.
Net Allowable Bearing Capacity
Allowable bearing capacity based on the net stress increase above the original overburden pressure; more accurate for foundation design.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Net allowable bearing capacity | - | |
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Original in-situ overburden pressure (\gamma D_f) | - | |
| Factor of Safety | - |
Bearing Capacity Analysis Procedure
To determine the safe dimensions for a shallow foundation:
- Identify Soil Profile: Determine the shear strength parameters (, ) and unit weight () of the soil layers beneath the footing.
- Determine Water Table: Locate the groundwater table and apply buoyancy corrections to and if it falls within the failure zone ().
- Select Method: Choose the appropriate bearing capacity equation (Terzaghi for simple strips/squares, Meyerhof/Hansen for inclined/eccentric loads or deep embedment).
- Calculate Ultimate Capacity (): Compute the theoretical maximum bearing pressure using the correct shape, depth, and inclination factors.
- Apply Factor of Safety: Divide by the required FS (usually 3.0) to find the Allowable Bearing Capacity ().
- Check Sizing: Ensure the foundation footprint () is large enough so that the applied pressure () is less than or equal to .
Interactive Bearing Capacity Lab
Interactive Simulation
Visualize how adjusting foundation dimensions () and critical soil properties () influences the ultimate bearing capacity curve.
Bearing Capacity Simulator (Square Footing)
The red dashed lines represent the potential shear failure surface in the soil. As increases, the failure surface extends further outward, mobilizing more soil resistance.
Effect of the Groundwater Table
Buoyancy Effect of Water
Water does not physically "lubricate" sand; rather, it introduces buoyancy (Archimedes' principle) that physically lifts the soil particles, reducing inter-particle friction (effective stress).
Water Table Correction Scenarios
- Case 1: Water table at or above the ground surface (): The soil is completely submerged. Use the buoyant unit weight () in all terms (for both and the wedge term). This effectively halves the bearing capacity.
- Case 2: Water table exactly at foundation level (): Use the moist/dry unit weight () to calculate the surcharge term (). However, use the buoyant unit weight () for the wedge term () since the failure wedge is fully submerged.
- Case 3: Water table at depth : The water is too deep to intersect the theoretical failure surface. No correction is needed. Use the moist/dry unit weight () in all terms.
- Intermediate Case (): Linearly interpolate an effective unit weight for the wedge term based on the exact depth of the water.
General Bearing Capacity Equation
The General Equation
General Bearing Capacity Equation
Extended Meyerhof-Hansen formula that accounts for foundation shape, depth of embedment, and inclined loading through correction factors.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Cohesion | - | |
| Bearing capacity factors | - | |
| Shape factors (accounting for B/L ratio) | - | |
| Depth factors (accounting for D_f/B ratio) | - | |
| Inclination factors (accounting for angled loads) | - | |
| Effective overburden pressure | - | |
| Unit weight of soil | - | |
| Width of foundation | - |
Eccentric Loading (Meyerhof's Effective Area)
Meyerhof's Effective Area Method
To calculate bearing capacity under eccentric loading, Meyerhof proposed assuming the load is concentric on a smaller, fictitious effective area ().
- Calculate Eccentricity: .
- Determine Effective Dimensions:
- (if eccentricity is along the width).
- (if eccentricity is along the length).
- Calculate Ultimate Capacity (): Use the General Bearing Capacity Equation substituting for , and calculating shape factors based on .
- Calculate Total Ultimate Load (): Multiply by the effective area.
Total Ultimate Load (Eccentric)
Ultimate total load capacity of a foundation under eccentric loading using Meyerhof's effective area method.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Total ultimate load | - | |
| Ultimate bearing capacity on effective area | - | |
| Effective width (B - 2e) | - | |
| Effective length (L - 2e) | - |
Settlement Control
Primary Types of Settlement
1. Immediate (Elastic) Settlement (): Occurs instantaneously as the load is applied, primarily due to elastic distortion of soil particles. Dominant in coarse-grained granular soils.
Elastic Settlement
Immediate settlement at the time of load application due to elastic distortion; governed by the soil's elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate (elastic) settlement | - | |
| Net applied pressure | - | |
| Width of footing | - | |
| Poisson's ratio of the soil | - | |
| Modulus of elasticity of the soil | - | |
| Influence factor (depends on shape and rigidity) | - |
2. Consolidation Settlement (): Time-dependent settlement caused by the slow, gradual expulsion of pore water from the voids in fine-grained cohesive soils (clays). (Detailed in the Compressibility chapter).
- Bearing Capacity is defined as the maximum applied load per unit area that the soil can safely support without undergoing a catastrophic shear failure.
- Terzaghi's Equation remains the foundational standard for analyzing shallow foundations, requiring specific modification via Shape Factors for non-strip geometries.
- The Water Table acts as a severe destabilizing agent. It reduces the effective bearing capacity by roughly 50% if it rises to the surface due to the physical loss of effective soil weight (buoyancy).
- Meyerhof's Effective Area Method () must be used to safely derate the bearing capacity of foundations subjected to eccentric loads (moments).
- Factors of Safety (typically ) are universally applied to the ultimate capacity to derive the safe Allowable Bearing Capacity () for structural design.
- Practical foundation design is ultimately governed by the lower bounding value between Bearing Capacity (Shear Failure, ULS) and Settlement limits (Serviceability, SLS).