Bearing Capacity

Learning Objectives

  • Understand the concept of bearing capacity and its importance in foundation design.
  • Apply Terzaghi's bearing capacity theory to calculate ultimate and allowable bearing capacity.
  • Evaluate the effect of the groundwater table on soil bearing capacity.
  • Understand the general bearing capacity equation and the effects of eccentric loading.

Bearing Capacity

The maximum contact pressure between the foundation and the soil which should not produce shear failure in the soil.

Ultimate Bearing Capacity (quq_u)

The theoretical maximum pressure that can be supported without catastrophic shear failure occurring in the supporting soil mass.

Allowable Bearing Capacity (qallq_{all})

The working pressure used for design, derived by dividing the ultimate bearing capacity by a Factor of Safety (FS) to ensure stability and limit settlement.

The bearing capacity of a soil is the maximum contact pressure that the soil can practically support without failing in shear. This is the primary safety criterion for the design of shallow foundations (DfBD_f \le B).

Modes of Shear Failure

Depending on the soil's relative density or stiffness, failure can occur in one of three primary modes:

  • General Shear Failure: Occurs in dense sands or stiff clays. It is characterized by a well-defined, continuous slip surface that extends all the way to the ground surface, resulting in sudden, catastrophic heaving on one or both sides of the footing.
  • Local Shear Failure: Occurs in medium dense sands or medium stiff clays. The slip surface extends only a short distance into the soil mass before terminating. Settlement is significant before any clear failure surface reaches the ground.
  • Punching Shear Failure: Occurs in loose sands or very soft clays. The footing simply punches downward into the soil with excessive settlement. No heave is observed at the surface, and the failure planes are strictly vertical beneath the footing edges.

Local Shear Adjustments

When designing for local or punching shear failure (loose/soft soils), the theoretical soil parameters must be empirically reduced. Terzaghi recommended using reduced cohesion (c=2/3cc' = 2/3 c) and a reduced friction angle (ϕ=arctan(23tanϕ)\phi' = \arctan(\frac{2}{3}\tan\phi)) before looking up bearing capacity factors.

Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Theory

Karl Terzaghi (1943) proposed the first comprehensive, widely adopted theory for the ultimate bearing capacity (quq_u) of a continuous, rough strip footing.

Terzaghi's Key Assumptions

Terzaghi's classical derivation rests on several simplifying assumptions:

  • The foundation is a continuous strip footing (length LBL \gg B).
  • The foundation depth is shallow (DfBD_f \le B).
  • The soil beneath the foundation is homogeneous and semi-infinite.
  • General shear failure governs the failure mechanism.
  • The base of the footing is rough, preventing soil from sliding along it.
  • The soil above the base of the footing (DfD_f) only provides weight (surcharge q=γDfq = \gamma D_f), offering no shear resistance.

General Equation (Strip Footing)

Terzaghi's Ultimate Bearing Capacity

Classic three-term formula for the ultimate bearing capacity of a continuous strip footing on a semi-infinite soil mass.

qu=cNc+qNq+0.5γBNγq_{u} = c N_c + q N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
ccCohesion of the soil-
NcN_cBearing capacity factor for cohesion-
qqEffective overburden pressure at foundation base (\gamma D_f)-
NqN_qBearing capacity factor for surcharge-
γ\gammaUnit weight of soil below foundation-
BBWidth of the strip footing-
NγN_\gammaBearing capacity factor for soil weight-
  • cNcc N_c: The cohesion term. Accounts for shear strength derived from soil cohesion.
  • qNqq N_q: The surcharge term. Accounts for the stabilizing weight of soil above the base.
  • 0.5γBNγ0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma: The density (wedge) term. Accounts for resistance provided by soil weight below the base.
  • Nc,Nq,NγN_c, N_q, N_\gamma are strictly mathematical functions of the internal friction angle (ϕ\phi).

Shape Factors

Because Terzaghi's original equation was explicitly derived for an infinitely long strip footing, empirical shape factors are applied to modify the equation for other common foundation geometries:

Square Footing (B×BB \times B):

Bearing Capacity (Square Footing)

Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation modified with empirical shape factors for a square footing.

qu=1.3cNc+qNq+0.4γBNγq_u = 1.3 c N_c + q N_q + 0.4 \gamma B N_\gamma

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
ccCohesion-
Nc,Nq,NγN_c, N_q, N_\gammaBearing capacity factors-
qqOverburden pressure-
γ\gammaUnit weight of soil-
BBWidth of the square footing-

Circular Footing (Diameter BB):

Bearing Capacity (Circular Footing)

Terzaghi's bearing capacity equation modified with empirical shape factors for a circular footing.

qu=1.3cNc+qNq+0.3γBNγq_u = 1.3 c N_c + q N_q + 0.3 \gamma B N_\gamma

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
ccCohesion-
Nc,Nq,NγN_c, N_q, N_\gammaBearing capacity factors-
qqOverburden pressure-
γ\gammaUnit weight of soil-
BBDiameter of the circular footing-

Allowable Bearing Capacity

To account for inherent soil variability and uncertainties in load estimation, the design load must provide an adequate Factor of Safety (FSFS) against catastrophic shear failure.

Allowable Bearing Capacity

Safe design bearing capacity obtained by dividing the ultimate capacity by a factor of safety; typically FS = 3.0 for permanent structures.

qall=quFSq_{all} = \frac{q_u}{FS}

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
qallq_{all}Allowable bearing capacity-
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
FSFSFactor of Safety-
  • Typical FS: 3.0 is the standard for permanent structures.
  • Net Allowable Bearing Capacity (qall(net)q_{all(net)}): Represents the additional pressure the soil can safely take above the original in-situ overburden pressure.

Net Allowable Bearing Capacity

Allowable bearing capacity based on the net stress increase above the original overburden pressure; more accurate for foundation design.

qall(net)=quqFSq_{all(net)} = \frac{q_u - q}{FS}

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
qall(net)q_{all(net)}Net allowable bearing capacity-
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
qqOriginal in-situ overburden pressure (\gamma D_f)-
FSFSFactor of Safety-

Bearing Capacity Analysis Procedure

To determine the safe dimensions for a shallow foundation:

  1. Identify Soil Profile: Determine the shear strength parameters (cc, ϕ\phi) and unit weight (γ\gamma) of the soil layers beneath the footing.
  2. Determine Water Table: Locate the groundwater table and apply buoyancy corrections to γ\gamma and qq if it falls within the failure zone (Dw<Df+BD_w < D_f + B).
  3. Select Method: Choose the appropriate bearing capacity equation (Terzaghi for simple strips/squares, Meyerhof/Hansen for inclined/eccentric loads or deep embedment).
  4. Calculate Ultimate Capacity (quq_u): Compute the theoretical maximum bearing pressure using the correct shape, depth, and inclination factors.
  5. Apply Factor of Safety: Divide quq_u by the required FS (usually 3.0) to find the Allowable Bearing Capacity (qallq_{all}).
  6. Check Sizing: Ensure the foundation footprint (AA) is large enough so that the applied pressure (P/AP/A) is less than or equal to qall(net)q_{all(net)}.

Interactive Bearing Capacity Lab

Interactive Simulation

Visualize how adjusting foundation dimensions (B,DfB, D_f) and critical soil properties (c,ϕc, \phi) influences the ultimate bearing capacity curve.

Bearing Capacity Simulator (Square Footing)

Ultimate Bearing Capacity
0.0 kPa
Calculated using Terzaghi's formula for square footing.
D_fB

The red dashed lines represent the potential shear failure surface in the soil. As phi\\phi increases, the failure surface extends further outward, mobilizing more soil resistance.

Effect of the Groundwater Table

The position of the groundwater table critically affects bearing capacity by altering the effective unit weight of the soil, thereby reducing its resisting weight.

Buoyancy Effect of Water

Water does not physically "lubricate" sand; rather, it introduces buoyancy (Archimedes' principle) that physically lifts the soil particles, reducing inter-particle friction (effective stress).

Water Table Correction Scenarios

  • Case 1: Water table at or above the ground surface (Dw=0D_w = 0): The soil is completely submerged. Use the buoyant unit weight (γ=γsatγw\gamma' = \gamma_{sat} - \gamma_w) in all terms (for both qq and the wedge term). This effectively halves the bearing capacity.
  • Case 2: Water table exactly at foundation level (Dw=DfD_w = D_f): Use the moist/dry unit weight (γ\gamma) to calculate the surcharge term (qq). However, use the buoyant unit weight (γ\gamma') for the wedge term (0.5γBNγ0.5 \gamma' B N_\gamma) since the failure wedge is fully submerged.
  • Case 3: Water table at depth DwDf+BD_w \ge D_f + B: The water is too deep to intersect the theoretical failure surface. No correction is needed. Use the moist/dry unit weight (γ\gamma) in all terms.
  • Intermediate Case (Df<Dw<Df+BD_f < D_w < D_f + B): Linearly interpolate an effective unit weight for the wedge term based on the exact depth of the water.

General Bearing Capacity Equation

Meyerhof (1963) and Hansen (1970) extended Terzaghi's classical theory to account for more complex, real-world conditions including rectangular shapes, deep embedment, and inclined loading.

The General Equation

General Bearing Capacity Equation

Extended Meyerhof-Hansen formula that accounts for foundation shape, depth of embedment, and inclined loading through correction factors.

qu=cNcFcsFcdFci+qNqFqsFqdFqi+0.5γBNγFγsFγdFγiq_u = c N_c F_{cs} F_{cd} F_{ci} + q N_q F_{qs} F_{qd} F_{qi} + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma F_{\gamma s} F_{\gamma d} F_{\gamma i}

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
ccCohesion-
Nc,Nq,NγN_c, N_q, N_\gammaBearing capacity factors-
Fcs,Fqs,FγsF_{cs}, F_{qs}, F_{\gamma s}Shape factors (accounting for B/L ratio)-
Fcd,Fqd,FγdF_{cd}, F_{qd}, F_{\gamma d}Depth factors (accounting for D_f/B ratio)-
Fci,Fqi,FγiF_{ci}, F_{qi}, F_{\gamma i}Inclination factors (accounting for angled loads)-
qqEffective overburden pressure-
γ\gammaUnit weight of soil-
BBWidth of foundation-

Eccentric Loading (Meyerhof's Effective Area)

When a foundation is subjected to a bending moment in addition to a vertical load (eccentric loading), the soil pressure is not uniform. The bearing capacity is significantly reduced.

Meyerhof's Effective Area Method

To calculate bearing capacity under eccentric loading, Meyerhof proposed assuming the load is concentric on a smaller, fictitious effective area (B×LB' \times L').

  1. Calculate Eccentricity: e=M/Pe = M / P.
  2. Determine Effective Dimensions:
    • B=B2eB' = B - 2e (if eccentricity is along the width).
    • L=L2eL' = L - 2e (if eccentricity is along the length).
  3. Calculate Ultimate Capacity (quq_u'): Use the General Bearing Capacity Equation substituting BB' for BB, and calculating shape factors based on B/LB'/L'.
  4. Calculate Total Ultimate Load (QultQ_{ult}): Multiply quq_u' by the effective area.

Total Ultimate Load (Eccentric)

Ultimate total load capacity of a foundation under eccentric loading using Meyerhof's effective area method.

Qult=qu×(B×L)Q_{ult} = q_u' \times (B' \times L')

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
QultQ_{ult}Total ultimate load-
quq_u'Ultimate bearing capacity on effective area-
BB'Effective width (B - 2e)-
LL'Effective length (L - 2e)-

Settlement Control

Bearing capacity strictly evaluates catastrophic shear failure (Ultimate Limit State). However, excessive Settlement (Serviceability Limit State) often governs the actual design, especially for very large footings resting on sand or clay.

Primary Types of Settlement

1. Immediate (Elastic) Settlement (SeS_e): Occurs instantaneously as the load is applied, primarily due to elastic distortion of soil particles. Dominant in coarse-grained granular soils.

Elastic Settlement

Immediate settlement at the time of load application due to elastic distortion; governed by the soil's elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio.

Se=qB1ν2EsIsS_e = q B \frac{1 - \nu^2}{E_s} I_s

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
SeS_eImmediate (elastic) settlement-
qqNet applied pressure-
BBWidth of footing-
ν\nuPoisson's ratio of the soil-
EsE_sModulus of elasticity of the soil-
IsI_sInfluence factor (depends on shape and rigidity)-

2. Consolidation Settlement (ScS_c): Time-dependent settlement caused by the slow, gradual expulsion of pore water from the voids in fine-grained cohesive soils (clays). (Detailed in the Compressibility chapter).

Key Takeaways
  • Bearing Capacity is defined as the maximum applied load per unit area that the soil can safely support without undergoing a catastrophic shear failure.
  • Terzaghi's Equation remains the foundational standard for analyzing shallow foundations, requiring specific modification via Shape Factors for non-strip geometries.
  • The Water Table acts as a severe destabilizing agent. It reduces the effective bearing capacity by roughly 50% if it rises to the surface due to the physical loss of effective soil weight (buoyancy).
  • Meyerhof's Effective Area Method (B=B2eB' = B - 2e) must be used to safely derate the bearing capacity of foundations subjected to eccentric loads (moments).
  • Factors of Safety (typically FS=3.0FS = 3.0) are universally applied to the ultimate capacity to derive the safe Allowable Bearing Capacity (qallq_{all}) for structural design.
  • Practical foundation design is ultimately governed by the lower bounding value between Bearing Capacity (Shear Failure, ULS) and Settlement limits (Serviceability, SLS).