Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations
Learning Objectives
- Identify and define the three primary modes of shear failure for shallow foundations: general, local, and punching shear.
- Differentiate between gross ultimate bearing capacity and net ultimate bearing capacity.
- Calculate ultimate bearing capacity using Terzaghi's foundational equations for continuous, square, and circular footings.
- Apply Skempton's method to determine the bearing capacity of saturated clays under undrained conditions.
- Utilize Meyerhof's General Bearing Capacity Equation, incorporating shape, depth, and inclination factors for diverse foundation scenarios.
- Evaluate the impacts of eccentric loading via the effective area method, compressibility considerations, and groundwater table fluctuations on safe foundation design.
Bearing Capacity
The maximum contact pressure that a foundation can exert on the underlying soil without causing shear failure.
Overview
Bearing capacity is the maximum contact pressure that a foundation can exert on the underlying soil without causing shear failure. For shallow foundations (where the depth is typically less than or equal to the width ), determining the ultimate bearing capacity () and selecting an appropriate allowable bearing capacity () is the cornerstone of foundation design.
Modes of Shear Failure
When a shallow foundation is loaded progressively to failure, the soil beneath it typically exhibits one of three distinct modes of shear failure, depending largely on the relative density or consistency of the soil.
Types of Shear Failure
- General Shear Failure: Characterized by a sudden, catastrophic failure accompanied by a well-defined failure surface extending up to the ground surface. There is noticeable, significant heaving of the soil on one or both sides of the footing. This mode is typical for relatively dense sands, stiff clays, and overconsolidated soils.
- Local Shear Failure: The failure surface develops progressively but does not fully reach the ground surface before the foundation begins to undergo significant settlement. Heaving is slight and occurs only in the immediate vicinity of the footing. This is characteristic of soils with medium density or medium stiffness.
- Punching Shear Failure: The foundation effectively "punches" downward into the soil with a roughly vertical shear surface. There is little to no heaving at the ground surface, but massive downward settlement occurs. This mode is typical for very loose sands, soft clays, and highly compressible soils.
Gross vs. Net Bearing Capacity
It is important to distinguish between the total pressure at the base of the footing and the new pressure added by the structure.
- Gross Ultimate Bearing Capacity (): The absolute maximum total pressure (including the weight of the structure, foundation, and soil surcharge) that can be applied to the soil before catastrophic shear failure occurs.
- Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (): The maximum additional pressure (above the existing overburden pressure ) that the foundation can support before shear failure. This represents the actual structural load capacity.
Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity
Relationship between net and gross bearing capacity.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Net ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Gross ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Effective overburden pressure at the foundation base level () | - |
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation (1943)
Karl Terzaghi developed the first comprehensive theory for the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow rough foundations. His theory assumed a general shear failure mode in a homogeneous soil under a continuous (strip) footing.
Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation
The ultimate bearing capacity of a continuous (strip) footing.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Effective cohesion of the soil | - | |
| Effective overburden pressure at the foundation base level () | - | |
| Unit weight of the soil below the foundation level | - | |
| Width of the footing | - | |
| Terzaghi's cohesion bearing capacity factor | - | |
| Terzaghi's overburden bearing capacity factor | - | |
| Terzaghi's unit weight bearing capacity factor | - |
Terzaghi's N Factors
The precise mathematical derivations for Terzaghi's dimensionless bearing capacity factors (, , ) depend strictly on the effective friction angle () of the soil.
Terzaghi's N_q Factor
Overburden bearing capacity factor based on friction angle.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Terzaghi's overburden bearing capacity factor | - | |
| Effective friction angle of the soil |
Terzaghi's N_c Factor
Cohesion bearing capacity factor based on N_q and friction angle.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Terzaghi's cohesion bearing capacity factor | - | |
| Terzaghi's overburden bearing capacity factor | - | |
| Effective friction angle of the soil |
Terzaghi's N_\gamma Factor
Unit weight bearing capacity factor based on friction angle.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Terzaghi's unit weight bearing capacity factor | - | |
| Passive earth pressure coefficient | - | |
| Effective friction angle of the soil |
N_\gamma Approximations
Because is empirically complex to define exactly, multiple approximations exist. The exact values are almost universally obtained from standard tables based on .
Modifications for Foundation Shape
Terzaghi modified his original strip footing equation empirically to account for square and circular footings.
- Square Footing:
- Circular Footing: (where is the diameter)
Skempton's Bearing Capacity for Clays ()
For foundations resting on saturated cohesive soils (clays) subjected to rapid loading, the undrained condition (, ) governs. A.W. Skempton observed that for clays, Terzaghi's (or ) is only valid for surface footings. Skempton proposed a modified equation where increases with depth and varies with footing shape.
Skempton's Bearing Capacity Equation
Modified bearing capacity equation for clays under undrained conditions.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Net ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Undrained shear strength of the clay | - | |
| Skempton's bearing capacity factor (starts at 5.14 for surface strip, max 9.0 for deep square/circular) | - |
The General Bearing Capacity Equation (Meyerhof, 1963)
While Terzaghi's equation is foundational, it has limitations. It assumes a strip footing, a rough base, no shear resistance in the soil above the foundation base (), and vertical concentric loading.
Meyerhof developed a more versatile "General Bearing Capacity Equation" that incorporates shape (), depth (), and load inclination () factors, making it applicable to a wider range of realistic design scenarios.
Meyerhof's General Bearing Capacity Equation
Extended bearing capacity equation incorporating shape, depth, and inclination.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bearing capacity | - | |
| Effective cohesion | - | |
| Effective overburden pressure | - | |
| Unit weight of the soil below the foundation | - | |
| Width of the footing | - | |
| Shape factor for cohesion term | - | |
| Shape factor for overburden term | - | |
| Shape factor for unit weight term | - | |
| Depth factor for cohesion term | - | |
| Depth factor for overburden term | - | |
| Depth factor for unit weight term | - | |
| Inclination factor for cohesion term | - | |
| Inclination factor for overburden term | - | |
| Inclination factor for unit weight term | - | |
| Meyerhof's cohesion factor | - | |
| Meyerhof's overburden factor | - | |
| Meyerhof's unit weight factor | - |
Vesic's Compressibility Factors
Both Terzaghi and Meyerhof assume the soil fails in general shear (a rigid-plastic behavior). However, very loose sands or highly compressible clays often fail in local or punching shear. A.S. Vesic introduced compressibility factors () to modify the general equation when the soil's rigidity index () falls below a critical threshold. This allows a unified equation to handle all failure modes.
Eccentric Loading (Effective Area Method)
When a foundation is subjected to a vertical load () and a moment (), the load acts eccentrically with an eccentricity . This causes non-uniform pressure. To apply the general bearing capacity equation, Meyerhof proposed the effective area concept. The foundation is assumed to have reduced, effective dimensions ( and ), where the load acts perfectly in the center of the effective area:
Effective Foundation Dimensions
Reduced dimensions to account for eccentric loading.
Variables
| Symbol | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Effective width | - | |
| Actual width | - | |
| Eccentricity in the direction of width | - | |
| Effective length | - | |
| Actual length | - | |
| Eccentricity in the direction of length | - |
Eccentric Load Capacity
The bearing capacity is calculated using and , and the total allowable load is .
Effect of Groundwater Table
The location of the groundwater table critically affects the unit weight () terms in the bearing capacity equations.
Groundwater Table Effects on Bearing Capacity
- If the water table is at or above the ground surface, the submerged unit weight () must be used for both the overburden term () and the width term ().
- If the water table is exactly at the foundation base level (), use the dry/moist unit weight for the overburden term (), but the submerged unit weight () for the width term.
- If the water table is far below the foundation ( below the base), no correction is needed; use the moist/dry unit weight throughout.
Bearing Capacity on Layered Soils
Natural soil deposits are rarely homogeneous. When a footing rests on a stronger soil layer underlain by a weaker layer (e.g., dense sand over soft clay), the failure surface might punch through the top layer into the weaker layer below. The ultimate bearing capacity must be checked against both failure within the top layer alone, and a "punching shear" failure extending into the weaker bottom layer. Specialized empirical methods (like Meyerhof's method for layered soils) are required to calculate the composite capacity.
Interactive Simulation
Use the interactive simulation below to observe how different parameters like cohesion, friction angle, and foundation dimensions affect bearing capacity.
Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Calculator
$N_c$
37.2
$N_q$
22.5
$N_\gamma$
8.4
Ultimate Capacity ($q_{ult}$)
1500 kPa
Allowable Capacity (FS=3)
500 kPa
- Shallow foundations generally fail in general, local, or punching shear modes, largely dictated by soil density.
- The Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity represents the actual structural load capacity beyond the existing overburden pressure of the soil.
- Terzaghi's fundamental equation calculates ultimate bearing capacity based on soil cohesion, overburden pressure, and footing width, but assumes a continuous strip footing and vertical loads.
- Skempton's method provides a depth-dependent factor specifically tailored for saturated clays under undrained conditions.
- Meyerhof's General Bearing Capacity Equation improves upon Terzaghi by incorporating shape, depth, and load inclination factors for more complex, realistic scenarios.
- Eccentric loads are handled by reducing the foundation dimensions to an "effective area" where the load acts concentrically.
- The presence of a high groundwater table significantly reduces bearing capacity by lowering the effective unit weight of the soil beneath and above the footing.
- A substantial Factor of Safety (typically 2.5 to 3.0) is applied to the ultimate capacity to determine the safe allowable bearing capacity for design.