Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations

Learning Objectives

  • Identify and define the three primary modes of shear failure for shallow foundations: general, local, and punching shear.
  • Differentiate between gross ultimate bearing capacity and net ultimate bearing capacity.
  • Calculate ultimate bearing capacity using Terzaghi's foundational equations for continuous, square, and circular footings.
  • Apply Skempton's method to determine the bearing capacity of saturated clays under undrained conditions.
  • Utilize Meyerhof's General Bearing Capacity Equation, incorporating shape, depth, and inclination factors for diverse foundation scenarios.
  • Evaluate the impacts of eccentric loading via the effective area method, compressibility considerations, and groundwater table fluctuations on safe foundation design.
Modes of failure, Terzaghi's and general bearing capacity equations.

Bearing Capacity

The maximum contact pressure that a foundation can exert on the underlying soil without causing shear failure.

Overview

Bearing capacity is the maximum contact pressure that a foundation can exert on the underlying soil without causing shear failure. For shallow foundations (where the depth DfD_f is typically less than or equal to the width BB), determining the ultimate bearing capacity (quq_u) and selecting an appropriate allowable bearing capacity (qallowq_{allow}) is the cornerstone of foundation design.

Modes of Shear Failure

When a shallow foundation is loaded progressively to failure, the soil beneath it typically exhibits one of three distinct modes of shear failure, depending largely on the relative density or consistency of the soil.

Types of Shear Failure

  • General Shear Failure: Characterized by a sudden, catastrophic failure accompanied by a well-defined failure surface extending up to the ground surface. There is noticeable, significant heaving of the soil on one or both sides of the footing. This mode is typical for relatively dense sands, stiff clays, and overconsolidated soils.
  • Local Shear Failure: The failure surface develops progressively but does not fully reach the ground surface before the foundation begins to undergo significant settlement. Heaving is slight and occurs only in the immediate vicinity of the footing. This is characteristic of soils with medium density or medium stiffness.
  • Punching Shear Failure: The foundation effectively "punches" downward into the soil with a roughly vertical shear surface. There is little to no heaving at the ground surface, but massive downward settlement occurs. This mode is typical for very loose sands, soft clays, and highly compressible soils.

Gross vs. Net Bearing Capacity

It is important to distinguish between the total pressure at the base of the footing and the new pressure added by the structure.

  • Gross Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qu,grossq_{u,gross}): The absolute maximum total pressure (including the weight of the structure, foundation, and soil surcharge) that can be applied to the soil before catastrophic shear failure occurs.
  • Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qu,netq_{u,net}): The maximum additional pressure (above the existing overburden pressure qq) that the foundation can support before shear failure. This represents the actual structural load capacity.

Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity

Relationship between net and gross bearing capacity.

qu,net=qu,grossqq_{u,net} = q_{u,gross} - q

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
qu,netq_{u,net}Net ultimate bearing capacity-
qu,grossq_{u,gross}Gross ultimate bearing capacity-
qqEffective overburden pressure at the foundation base level (γDf\gamma \cdot D_f)-

Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation (1943)

Karl Terzaghi developed the first comprehensive theory for the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow rough foundations. His theory assumed a general shear failure mode in a homogeneous soil under a continuous (strip) footing.

Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation

The ultimate bearing capacity of a continuous (strip) footing.

qu=cNc+qNq+0.5γBNγ q_u = c' N_c + q N_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
cc'Effective cohesion of the soil-
qqEffective overburden pressure at the foundation base level (q=γDfq = \gamma \cdot D_f)-
γ\gammaUnit weight of the soil below the foundation level-
BBWidth of the footing-
NcN_cTerzaghi's cohesion bearing capacity factor-
NqN_qTerzaghi's overburden bearing capacity factor-
NγN_\gammaTerzaghi's unit weight bearing capacity factor-

Terzaghi's N Factors

The precise mathematical derivations for Terzaghi's dimensionless bearing capacity factors (NcN_c, NqN_q, NγN_\gamma) depend strictly on the effective friction angle (ϕ\phi') of the soil.

Terzaghi's N_q Factor

Overburden bearing capacity factor based on friction angle.

Nq=e2(3π/4ϕ/2)tanϕ2cos2(45+ϕ/2)N_q = \frac{e^{2(3\pi/4 - \phi'/2)\tan \phi'}}{2 \cos^2(45^\circ + \phi'/2)}

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
NqN_qTerzaghi's overburden bearing capacity factor-
ϕ\phi'Effective friction angle of the soil^\circ

Terzaghi's N_c Factor

Cohesion bearing capacity factor based on N_q and friction angle.

Nc=cotϕ(Nq1)N_c = \cot \phi' (N_q - 1)

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
NcN_cTerzaghi's cohesion bearing capacity factor-
NqN_qTerzaghi's overburden bearing capacity factor-
ϕ\phi'Effective friction angle of the soil^\circ

Terzaghi's N_\gamma Factor

Unit weight bearing capacity factor based on friction angle.

Nγ12(Kpγcos2ϕ1)tanϕN_\gamma \approx \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{K_{p\gamma}}{\cos^2 \phi'} - 1 \right) \tan \phi'

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
NγN_\gammaTerzaghi's unit weight bearing capacity factor-
KpγK_{p\gamma}Passive earth pressure coefficient-
ϕ\phi'Effective friction angle of the soil^\circ

N_\gamma Approximations

Because NγN_\gamma is empirically complex to define exactly, multiple approximations exist. The exact values are almost universally obtained from standard tables based on ϕ\phi'.

Modifications for Foundation Shape

Terzaghi modified his original strip footing equation empirically to account for square and circular footings.

  • Square Footing: qu=1.3cNc+qNq+0.4γBNγq_u = 1.3 c' N_c + q N_q + 0.4 \gamma B N_\gamma
  • Circular Footing: qu=1.3cNc+qNq+0.3γBNγq_u = 1.3 c' N_c + q N_q + 0.3 \gamma B N_\gamma (where BB is the diameter)

Skempton's Bearing Capacity for Clays (ϕ=0\phi = 0)

For foundations resting on saturated cohesive soils (clays) subjected to rapid loading, the undrained condition (ϕ=0\phi = 0, c=suc = s_u) governs. A.W. Skempton observed that for clays, Terzaghi's Nc=5.14N_c = 5.14 (or 5.75.7) is only valid for surface footings. Skempton proposed a modified equation where NcN_c increases with depth and varies with footing shape.

Skempton's Bearing Capacity Equation

Modified bearing capacity equation for clays under undrained conditions.

qu,net=suNc,skempton q_{u,net} = s_u \cdot N_{c,skempton}

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
qu,netq_{u,net}Net ultimate bearing capacity-
sus_uUndrained shear strength of the clay-
Nc,skemptonN_{c,skempton}Skempton's bearing capacity factor (starts at 5.14 for surface strip, max 9.0 for deep square/circular)-

The General Bearing Capacity Equation (Meyerhof, 1963)

While Terzaghi's equation is foundational, it has limitations. It assumes a strip footing, a rough base, no shear resistance in the soil above the foundation base (DfD_f), and vertical concentric loading.

Meyerhof developed a more versatile "General Bearing Capacity Equation" that incorporates shape (ss), depth (dd), and load inclination (ii) factors, making it applicable to a wider range of realistic design scenarios.

Meyerhof's General Bearing Capacity Equation

Extended bearing capacity equation incorporating shape, depth, and inclination.

qu=cNcscdcic+qNqsqdqiq+0.5γBNγsγdγiγ q_u = c' N_c s_c d_c i_c + q N_q s_q d_q i_q + 0.5 \gamma B N_\gamma s_\gamma d_\gamma i_\gamma

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
quq_uUltimate bearing capacity-
cc'Effective cohesion-
qqEffective overburden pressure-
γ\gammaUnit weight of the soil below the foundation-
BBWidth of the footing-
scs_cShape factor for cohesion term-
sqs_qShape factor for overburden term-
sγs_\gammaShape factor for unit weight term-
dcd_cDepth factor for cohesion term-
dqd_qDepth factor for overburden term-
dγd_\gammaDepth factor for unit weight term-
ici_cInclination factor for cohesion term-
iqi_qInclination factor for overburden term-
iγi_\gammaInclination factor for unit weight term-
NcN_cMeyerhof's cohesion factor-
NqN_qMeyerhof's overburden factor-
NγN_\gammaMeyerhof's unit weight factor-

Vesic's Compressibility Factors

Both Terzaghi and Meyerhof assume the soil fails in general shear (a rigid-plastic behavior). However, very loose sands or highly compressible clays often fail in local or punching shear. A.S. Vesic introduced compressibility factors (Cc,Cq,CγC_c, C_q, C_\gamma) to modify the general equation when the soil's rigidity index (Ir=Gc+qtanϕI_r = \frac{G}{c + q \tan \phi}) falls below a critical threshold. This allows a unified equation to handle all failure modes.

Eccentric Loading (Effective Area Method)

When a foundation is subjected to a vertical load (QQ) and a moment (MM), the load acts eccentrically with an eccentricity e=M/Qe = M/Q. This causes non-uniform pressure. To apply the general bearing capacity equation, Meyerhof proposed the effective area concept. The foundation is assumed to have reduced, effective dimensions (BB' and LL'), where the load acts perfectly in the center of the effective area:

Effective Foundation Dimensions

Reduced dimensions to account for eccentric loading.

B=B2eB B' = B - 2e_BL=L2eL L' = L - 2e_L

Variables

SymbolDescriptionUnit
BB'Effective width-
BBActual width-
eBe_BEccentricity in the direction of width-
LL'Effective length-
LLActual length-
eLe_LEccentricity in the direction of length-

Eccentric Load Capacity

The bearing capacity quq_u is calculated using BB' and LL', and the total allowable load is Qallow=(qu/FS)×B×LQ_{allow} = (q_u / FS) \times B' \times L'.

Effect of Groundwater Table

The location of the groundwater table critically affects the unit weight (γ\gamma) terms in the bearing capacity equations.

Groundwater Table Effects on Bearing Capacity

Bearing Capacity on Layered Soils

Natural soil deposits are rarely homogeneous. When a footing rests on a stronger soil layer underlain by a weaker layer (e.g., dense sand over soft clay), the failure surface might punch through the top layer into the weaker layer below. The ultimate bearing capacity must be checked against both failure within the top layer alone, and a "punching shear" failure extending into the weaker bottom layer. Specialized empirical methods (like Meyerhof's method for layered soils) are required to calculate the composite capacity.

Interactive Simulation

Use the interactive simulation below to observe how different parameters like cohesion, friction angle, and foundation dimensions affect bearing capacity.

Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Calculator

$N_c$

37.2

$N_q$

22.5

$N_\gamma$

8.4

Ultimate Capacity ($q_{ult}$)

1500 kPa

Allowable Capacity (FS=3)

500 kPa

Key Takeaways
  • Shallow foundations generally fail in general, local, or punching shear modes, largely dictated by soil density.
  • The Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity represents the actual structural load capacity beyond the existing overburden pressure of the soil.
  • Terzaghi's fundamental equation calculates ultimate bearing capacity based on soil cohesion, overburden pressure, and footing width, but assumes a continuous strip footing and vertical loads.
  • Skempton's method provides a depth-dependent NcN_c factor specifically tailored for saturated clays under undrained conditions.
  • Meyerhof's General Bearing Capacity Equation improves upon Terzaghi by incorporating shape, depth, and load inclination factors for more complex, realistic scenarios.
  • Eccentric loads are handled by reducing the foundation dimensions to an "effective area" where the load acts concentrically.
  • The presence of a high groundwater table significantly reduces bearing capacity by lowering the effective unit weight of the soil beneath and above the footing.
  • A substantial Factor of Safety (typically 2.5 to 3.0) is applied to the ultimate capacity to determine the safe allowable bearing capacity for design.