Aggregates — Worked Examples
These examples connect representative sampling and laboratory measurements to concrete/asphalt proportioning and acceptance decisions. Calculations use the moisture and mass bases stated in each problem.
Example 1 — Check mass closure in a sieve analysis
A dry fine-aggregate test portion has an initial mass of . The masses retained on the sieves and pan are 10, 55, 110, 100, 120, 85, and 20 g. Verify mass closure before calculating gradation.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 2 Steps CompletedExample 2 — Fineness modulus of fine aggregate
For the same sample, masses retained are: No. 4 = 10 g, No. 8 = 55 g, No. 16 = 110 g, No. 30 = 100 g, No. 50 = 120 g, No. 100 = 85 g, pan = 20 g. Determine the fineness modulus using cumulative percentages retained on No. 4 through No. 100.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedExample 3 — Coarse-aggregate bulk and apparent relative density
A coarse aggregate has oven-dry mass in air , SSD mass in air , and saturated apparent mass in water . Determine bulk dry, bulk SSD, apparent relative density, and absorption.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 4 Steps CompletedExample 4 — Wet aggregate batch mass and free water
A concrete mixture requires of coarse aggregate at SSD. Aggregate absorption is 0.80% and measured total moisture is 2.80%, both on an oven-dry basis. Determine wet batch mass and free water above SSD.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedExample 5 — Aggregate below SSD and water demand
A mixture requires SSD fine aggregate. Absorption is 1.5%, but the stockpile total moisture is only 0.5% on an OD basis. Determine the wet scale mass and the additional water needed for the aggregate to reach SSD during mixing.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedExample 6 — Two-source aggregate blending on one sieve
Aggregate A has 15% passing the 9.5 mm sieve and Aggregate B has 95% passing. A preliminary blend target is 55% passing on that sieve. Determine the required mass fractions for this single-sieve constraint.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 4 Steps CompletedExample 7 — Interpret Los Angeles abrasion results
Two coarse-aggregate sources are tested by the same specified Los Angeles abrasion procedure. Source X reports 21% loss and Source Y reports 38% loss. Explain what can be concluded without inventing an acceptance limit.
Step-by-Step Solution
0 of 3 Steps CompletedExample 8 — Diagnose a nonrepresentative stockpile sample
A technician collects a single bucket of fine aggregate from the clean, dry top of a large stockpile after rain. The laboratory result shows 1.0% moisture, but concrete production later exhibits large slump and yield variation. Diagnose the sampling problem.